Pikipedia:Featured article/nominations: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[category:featured articles| ]]
[[category:featured articles| ]]
'''''Archived nominations can be found at [[Pikmin:featured articles/past nominations]].'''''
'''''Archived nominations can be found at [[Pikipedia:featured articles/past nominations]].'''''


This page is used to nominate articles to be featured on the Main Page. To nominate an article, create a new section titled the name of the article you nominate, then create 'support' and 'oppose' subsections and sign your name under 'support', along with your reasons if necessary. Other users can then sign their support or opposition and the article will be featured when a new one is needed if it has enough support.
This page is used to nominate articles to be featured on the Main Page. To nominate an article, create a new section titled the name of the article you nominate, then create 'support' and 'oppose' subsections and sign your name under 'support', along with your reasons if necessary. Other users can then sign their support or opposition and the article will be featured when a new one is needed if it has enough support.

Revision as of 03:21, September 21, 2010

Archived nominations can be found at Pikipedia:featured articles/past nominations.

This page is used to nominate articles to be featured on the Main Page. To nominate an article, create a new section titled the name of the article you nominate, then create 'support' and 'oppose' subsections and sign your name under 'support', along with your reasons if necessary. Other users can then sign their support or opposition and the article will be featured when a new one is needed if it has enough support.

A featured article must be well-written, as complete as is feasible and interesting to read. This requires that it also has adequate appropriate tables, diagrams or images.

2-Player Mode

Lot's of info, we've had Waterwraith way too long.

Support

  • Nominator. Vol (Talk)
  • It could be better, but it's good enough, I guess.GP

Oppose

Comments