553
edits
Talk:Vegetation: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Created page with "== Merge == Okay, we need to discuss what to do with this page. We have this, and we have Plants and fungi. This page is good, because it focuses not only on how plants ar...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I want to hear your opinions on this. Do you agree about what the page should have, content-wise? And what do you have to say about the potential name for the article? — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:08, 30 June 2015 (EDT) | I want to hear your opinions on this. Do you agree about what the page should have, content-wise? And what do you have to say about the potential name for the article? — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:08, 30 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:I agree that one page is enough to describe all the plants and fungi in these games. I also like your idea of naming important gameplay plants and fungi first, and then having the list and the unnamed ones; to me that seems a lot more organized. I've been researching a name and it seems that mycology is regarded by the International Botanical Congress as an official branch of [[wikipedia:Botany|botany]]. So we could possibly call the page "Botanical objects" or "Botanical organisms". I know it still sort of sounds like it's excluding fungi, but the only other option I could think of was the domain "Eukaryota," which contains both the kingdoms Plantae and Fungi, but also contains Animalia. That being said, it would be neat to create a sort of "Pikmin tree of life" in which the organisms in the game are visually classified into their kingdoms and families... I know the taxonomy of the organisms is inconsistent in the games, but it's just a fleeting idea I had. [[User:Scruffy|Scruffy]] ([[User talk:Scruffy|talk]]) 08:05, 30 June 2015 (EDT) | |||