10,616
edits
Talk:Fiery Young Yellow Wollywog: Difference between revisions
m
Soprano moved page Talk:Fiery Young Yellow Wollyhop to Talk:Fiery Young Yellow Wollywog over redirect: "Firey Young Yellow Wollywog" is the latest official American English name for this enemy.
(→/* Taxonomic homonyms: new section */ new section) |
m (Soprano moved page Talk:Fiery Young Yellow Wollyhop to Talk:Fiery Young Yellow Wollywog over redirect: "Firey Young Yellow Wollywog" is the latest official American English name for this enemy.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Two species having the same binomial nomenclature (species name AND genus name), called hemihomonyms, is even ''technically'' allowed albeit misleading, as long as they are in separate kingdoms. | Two species having the same binomial nomenclature (species name AND genus name), called hemihomonyms, is even ''technically'' allowed albeit misleading, as long as they are in separate kingdoms. | ||
--[[Special:Contributions/72.39.150.64|72.39.150.64]] 10:38, February 19, 2023 (EST) | --[[Special:Contributions/72.39.150.64|72.39.150.64]] 10:38, February 19, 2023 (EST) | ||
:You're right that there's a lot of slightly-incorrect taxonomy on the wiki. A few years ago someone noted in a lot of articles that species in different families cannot share a genus, which is technically correct as you say (as long as the species are in different kingdoms), but it's usually presented in a misleading way. And this example you've found is definitely wrong and was probably the editor making a mistake. Since you seem to know what you're talking about with taxonomy, you should consider fixing more of these errors and misleading statements (but only if you want to), since none of the other editors are quite sure on what the rules are. — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 16:16, February 19, 2023 (EST) | |||