Editing Talk:Bridge

You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 74: Line 74:
::Thanks. I noticed that there's also reference to the fact that a bridge's colour and length are directly correlated. After I've had a little time to rest, do you want me to check if each colour bridge actually does have the same number of tiles? [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 04:19, 27 November 2015 (EST)
::Thanks. I noticed that there's also reference to the fact that a bridge's colour and length are directly correlated. After I've had a little time to rest, do you want me to check if each colour bridge actually does have the same number of tiles? [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 04:19, 27 November 2015 (EST)
:::If that list is complete, then counting should be pretty simple. It'd be nice to know those numbers, for sure. But there's no rush. &mdash; '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 06:28, 27 November 2015 (EST)
:::If that list is complete, then counting should be pretty simple. It'd be nice to know those numbers, for sure. But there's no rush. &mdash; '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 06:28, 27 November 2015 (EST)
== Split ==
Just like what happened with the [[gate]] article, I think that the bridge article should be split. I think these bridges are unique enough to deserve their own articles as they look different, they function differently, and I believe that there is a decent amount of information to say about each of the bridges. Again, like how the gate article does it, this article could give a brief summary of each bridge and mentioning some of the more unique bridges (such as the fragment pot in {{p3}}, and that [[poison]] stick bridge in {{p2}}. It would also mention the ''clay bridge'', like how it does now.
There could be a ''stick bridge'' article (for both {{p1}} and ''Pikmin 2''), a ''fragment bridge'' article (for both ''Pikmin 3'' and {{hp}}, and a ''hay'' article (for just ''Pikmin 3''). For the fragments, they could either be in the ''fragment bridge'' article, or have their own article. What do you think about this idea, and do you think the ''fragments'' should be in the ''fragment bridge'' article? '''[[User:Chazmatron|Chazmatron, signing off!]]''' [[User talk:Chazmatron|(TALK)]] 21:42, 27 February, 2025

Please note that all contributions to Pikipedia are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (see Pikipedia:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: