I believe this was separated from the article before and we chose to put it in the main article. I think that, since this page is so short, it should be made a redirect to that part of the article.GP
- I agree I'm ~Lonely
Turret~ And I approve this message.
Unless this redirect is going to be categorized under Glitches, it should probably be deleted, and links redirected to the Libra article. —Jimbo Jambo 21:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is more for if people are searching 'Libra glitch', in which case they're sent to the right page via this one.GP
- Why would someone search for that? This is the place they would most likely hear about it first. Also, we could categorize the redirect as such. We wouldn't have a useless article, but it would still be easy for someone looking for glitches to find. —Jimbo Jambo 18:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- The same reason we have prezidant... well it was some odd redirect... that I don't know how to spell. Ah, Prez knows...I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.
- ...Are you suggesting someone could misspell "Libra" as "Libra Glitch"? —Jimbo Jambo 20:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, no... I'm saying someone has or is bound to search for it... I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.
- Yeah, there's no problem with having a redirect, right? And what you're saying about categorising it - would that work for a redirect? Would it make sense? Should 'Libra glitch' not be the one categorised in that way instead?GP
