is the atmosphere carbon dioxide or methane? im not sure if the game ever tells you? Something more universal than a quarter needs to be used for size comparison. Discordance 09:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
"With such advanced technology, it is ironic that comparatively primitive human-made objects are considered valuable treasures." This statement seems a bit odd - surely it's just the same as us considering the relics of ancient civilizations to be valuable? -- Anon 12:10, 21 Feburary 2005 (EST AUS)
- Agreed. I found the irony worth mentioning, though...--Prezintenden
- Same here, what makes something valuable is not the object is make how rare it is.--[url="http://www.WolfMark6.webs.com"][img]http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/2166/werehogsignatureex7.png[/img][/url] 14:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Treasure Value
I don't like the fact that the treasures are not valuable for Hocotatian people because of their old technology. If we find a caveman's ax, we put it in a museum, don't we? 
Snakeboss14
- Already took it out.
However, the items are apparently sold not for their historical/sentimental value, but for their practical one. For example, Olimar marvels at the "unlimited" energy of a battery. It is valued for its "advanced" technology, though it is relatively primitive, making it ironic. However, in the way it is currently worded, it sounds to opinionated. I suggest we reword maybe. IAMAHIPO_ocolor 02:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)