Talk:Treasure Hoard
I'm trying to improve this by making the columns sortable properly (it looks like there's been an attempt to implement it, but strange things happen). So far, I've got:
Succulent Series
| NTSC # | PAL # | Name | Real world object |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Cupid's Grenade | Cherry |
| 2 | 2 | Sunseed Berry | Small Strawberry |
| 3 | 3 | Combustion Berry | Large Strawberry |
| 4 | 4 | Seed of Greed | Chestnut |
| 5 | 5 | Disguised Delicacy | Half of a Kiwi |
| 6 | 6 | Insect Condo | Apple |
| 7 | 7 | Citrus Lump | Orange |
(Click the icons at the right of each title to sort.)
but I'm not sure how to link each of the tables for each group up into one big one like it is now. Is it okay to have series as separate tables, or should I keep experimenting? Alternatively, all treasures could be in one table (sorting is cooler then as well), but there'd be no series subtitles. Also, I need to learn how to have the last column non-sortable - there's no need to sort alphabetically by description. - Greenpickle(talk) 20:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I find that seperating the series would make more sense than bundling it all together. It's easier to sort- and overlook it that way.
Uh, about the column. I'm not sure if we need this. I appreciate your work, but in my opinion, we should sort it the way the game does. So, basically it should be sorted by the NTSC numbers. However, that would make it harder for those with PAL, and if we make it sortable, and then we could sort the in-game name aswell; with that we would be where we started: everything ecxept the real-world name. Well, sorry I'm not being a big help here; I'm just not sure...--Prezintenden(babble) 12:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Basically, I think having the columns sortable, at least by PAL/NTSC numbers, would help compare PAL/NTSC treasures, or just sort it as your version does. The default order still remains, it's only when you click one of the icons that the sort order changes. It reverts to the normal order each time the page is reloaded. What made me think about doing this was one of the entries on User:Discordance/to do. - Greenpickle(talk) 19:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Aha! Last column is now not sortable! - Greenpickle(talk) 19:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
So what's the verdict? Change or no?GP
Huh? What do you mean? I thought you changed it? It's sortable...
Uh, now that I checked it again... It doesn't really sort it in a understandable way. I can't find a pattern. Does one even exist? I guess with your comment you ment that you weren't finished with this? If you want to sort it, then you have my full support.--Prezintenden(babble)
I haven't changed the one on the page at all, only put this one here as an example. I will change it then.GP
Okay, I've done that, but I think it would be nice to have all treasures together in another table with 'Series' as another column, and all sortable together. Should I put that on the same page, or make a new page for it? Or is it a silly idea?GP
I'm having a hard time understanding you. I get that you want make a table where the sortable series are. You then pick a series and the items from that series show up. Those again are sortable aswell. I think I'm misconceiveing you; but if thats what you plan: sounds superb and very complicated.
Ah, wait, I read it again. Yeah, sounds good; but is it possible to make it sort primarely by series and then, uh, sub-sort it by any other column?--Prezintenden(babble)