Talk:Skitter Leaf

I don't think this should be in the harmless enemy category cause it can hurt captains when it shakes.It causes a very small amount of damage but its still damage.--Man-at-Legs888 05:30, 22 February 2011 (EST)

Well, it's a bit subjective. One can call harmless to an enemy that can deliver absolutely no damage, an enemy that can only damage captains, an enemy that can only shake off Pikmin, an enemy that can do several weird things, but not kill them, or any combination. So it's not too important. I think that in this wiki, "harmless enemies" are the ones that can't kill Pikmin directly. {Espyo^T} 07:30, 22 February 2011 (EST)

Yeah, I'd say it's harmless enough to fit in here. It's just such minor damage. It's really less of a threat than the Antenna Beetle.--Prezintenden

Yeah, putting it in the category is in agreement with the description on the category page. GP

Mamuta's been brought up: it's harmless too under the category's definition. Is there anyone that thinks we should use a different definition (see Snakeboss's comment on the talk page)? GP

I say we add Mamuta to that category. This category is important about the Pikmin, not the captains. Besides, one doesn't find "no damage" runs of either Pikmin game, only "no [Pikmin] death" runs. {Espyo^T} 18:07, 22 February 2011 (EST)

If it follows the definition, we should add it. Vol (Talk)

I agree with Vol.Though we can change the category name to:"enemies harmless to pikmin".--Man-at-Legs888 00:23, 24 February 2011 (EST)

Plus not only the Mamuta would go there but the Bumbling snitchbug as well.--Man-at-Legs888 06:05, 24 February 2011 (EST)

If it's Pikmin-only, then yes, seeing as Mamutas can do considerable damage to captains. Not sure if we need the name change... Although it would make sense, yeah.--Prezintenden