Template talk:Image: Difference between revisions

Template talk:Image (edit)

384 bytes added , 13 years ago

no edit summary

578

edits

Revision as of 04:49, March 23, 2011 (edit) Espyo (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:00, March 23, 2011 (edit) (undo) Prezintenden (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:::::::Oh no, not missing. Low quality images. This template used to be used to indicate that a page has no pictures, but I changed it to make it note that a page has no pictures ''or'' has low quality pictures. If I'm not mistaken, a lot of wikis that use this template make it double as a missing/lowres image warning '''{''[[User:Espyo\|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo\|T]]</sup>}''' 05:49, 23 March 2011 (EDT)		:::::::Oh no, not missing. Low quality images. This template used to be used to indicate that a page has no pictures, but I changed it to make it note that a page has no pictures ''or'' has low quality pictures. If I'm not mistaken, a lot of wikis that use this template make it double as a missing/lowres image warning '''{''[[User:Espyo\|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo\|T]]</sup>}''' 05:49, 23 March 2011 (EDT)

			::::::::Not going to remove the white because we're going to get whole different picture entirely anyway soon. However, do we really even need one? I know I uploaded this, but I don't think it was for any smart reason, and I'm quite certain none of our templates have an image. I feel as if it would be better without, even though most seem to use images.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}}