Forum:Spammers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Gamefreak75 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Oh, if you wanted some sort of reason for not enabling it for registered users, look at the minor edits I just made to treasure pages - this is the sort of thing a normal user might feasibly want to do, and takes much longer if you're forced to preview every edit first. <span style="font-family:times;">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#080;">G</span>]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050;">P</span>]]'''''</span> | ::Oh, if you wanted some sort of reason for not enabling it for registered users, look at the minor edits I just made to treasure pages - this is the sort of thing a normal user might feasibly want to do, and takes much longer if you're forced to preview every edit first. <span style="font-family:times;">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#080;">G</span>]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050;">P</span>]]'''''</span> | ||
:::I agree on enabling it for anonymous users. --{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | |||
Revision as of 17:05, January 17, 2011
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Spammers
This extension, mentioned here, sounds like it would help keep away the spammer bots fairly well. Vol (Talk)
- Well, it seems ok, but does this extension also forces registered users? Personally, I don't have much of a problem with that, as I almost always preview before editing, but it can still be a bore. {EspyoT} 13:33, 17 January 2011 (EST)
