Forum:Naming Standards: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Im for the former... I think it makes the articles seem to have more quality. [[User:68.39.16.71|68.39.16.71]] 09:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | Im for the former... I think it makes the articles seem to have more quality. [[User:68.39.16.71|68.39.16.71]] 09:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, I used to prefer than on the same basis; but now, I think it makes it more difficult to determine which words should be capitalised and which not. Also, the second is what is used in most places, including Wikipedia.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 12:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:57, March 30, 2008
Forums: Index > Watercooler (Pikipedia) > Naming Standards
We're going to have to decide once and for all which to have:
- Capitalise all words in article titles except small ones like "of" and "to"; or
- Capitalise only the first word and proper nouns.
Discuss, so that I can start fixing them. Also, in-article headings is another matter; for that, I definitely think the second of the above would be right.GP 11:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I've always been for the latter option. Are there seriously so many pages to re-name?--Prezintenden
Im for the former... I think it makes the articles seem to have more quality. 68.39.16.71 09:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)