Pikipedia talk:Featured article/nominations: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
|[[Bulbmin]]||4||2||2
|[[Bulbmin]]||4||2||2
|-
|-
|[[The Ship]]||1||0||1
|[[Figwort]]||1||0||1
|}
|}
And now for the sig (of DOOM).{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 18:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
And now for the sig (of DOOM).{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 18:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:46, August 29, 2008

I have to clear this before we continue: Do we accept recently rotating articles to be featured again?--Prezintenden 16:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I'd say yes; we're sort of starting all over again.GP 16:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Right.--Prezintenden 17:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Decision time, methinks

I say we just go quantitatively, adding up the votes; support is +1, oppose is -1. If that's the case, it's like this right now:

Article Support Oppose Score
Bulbmin 4 2 2
Figwort 1 0 1

And now for the sig (of DOOM).GP 18:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Right. I'll get to this feature.--Prezintenden
I already did when I saw this. It is a copy + paste mismatch but it is Pretty good.~CrystalRedpikminsprite.jpgLucario~ 11:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I changed Prez's added sentence to the text about the stage from the article, and corrected a few errors, added a few links.GP 15:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Changing feature to Scale, the most voted for.GP 16:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Got problems. Don't think votes are positive enough on any to warrant featuring, and it's been a while.GP
You feel Bulbmin is a spoiler, but won't suggest anything else. We need a new feature. I think Bulbmin should be featured, but it needs discussion as to whether it's too much of a spoiler.GP