Pikipedia talk:Featured article/nominations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:Got problems. Don't think votes are positive enough on any to warrant featuring, and it's been a while.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | :Got problems. Don't think votes are positive enough on any to warrant featuring, and it's been a while.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
:: | ::You feel Bulbmin is a spoiler, but won't suggest anything else. We ''need'' a new feature. I think Bulbmin should be featured, but it needs discussion as to whether it's too much of a spoiler.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} |
Revision as of 06:08, August 23, 2008
I have to clear this before we continue: Do we accept recently rotating articles to be featured again?--Prezintenden 16:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Right.--Prezintenden 17:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Decision time, methinks
I say we just go quantitatively, adding up the votes; support is +1, oppose is -1. If that's the case, it's like this right now:
Article | Support | Oppose | Score |
---|---|---|---|
Bulbmin | 4 | 2 | 2 |
The Ship | 1 | 0 | 1 |
And now for the sig (of DOOM).GP 18:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Changing feature to Scale, the most voted for.GP 16:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)