Talk:Spotcap

About splitting the article

There's been a template in regards to splitting the Spotcap and Kingcap from one another for the sake of parity, but no such discussion on the talk page. I figured I'd remedy this, and also give my two cents.

I'm very much in favor of the split--Generally speaking, if there's entities in this series that are of the same classification, but have literally any differences whatsoever, the two entities get their own distinct pages. This can range from minor differences like Common Glowcaps and Glowstems where the only difference gameplay-wise is a unique Piklopedia entry and Glowstems usually marking Bomb Rocks traps, or more major differences where Dwarf Red Bulborbs and Red Bulborbs being just entirely different in terms of gameplay, species, lore, etc..

While the Spotcap and the Kingcap both lack Piklopedia entries to differentiate them in Pikmin 3 Deluxe (smh nintendo ;P), it seems Nintendo definitely considers Spotcaps and Kingcaps different enough from each other, both in terms of gameplay (Kingcaps are beefier in terms of health, whereas Spotcaps are smaller and weaker) and in terms of their iconography, sort of (Kingcaps are the basis for the Challenge mushrooms in Pikmin Bloom, and most UI only uses single Kingcap mushrooms to represent Challenges altogether. Spotcaps, meanwhile, despite existing in Pikmin Bloom, are primarily used as decoration for the central Kingcap mushroom in the challenge proper, as well as the UI to show how "big" a Challenge is).

This *does*, however, leave a question about the brown mushrooms in the arena for the Armored Mawdad. To my awareness, they have no name, so they'd go in Minor obstacles--however, if it turns out they do have a name (be it by Nintendo confirming in an e-mail what their name is like what happened with the Wario Land II enemies and VB Wario Land Bosses, the name in the files, or maybe even them directly name-dropping them), I'd say it may be worthwhile to decide if they belong on either the newly-split Spotcap/Kingcap articles or even their own articles entirely depending on if any further differences become emergent.

Admittedly, as just a standard user, I don't want to rashly try splitting the pages myself, especially if it turns out this idea literally came from just the one edit that added the template, and then myself. So I'll pose the question here--should we split the Spotcap and Kingcap? -Camwoodstock (talk) 13:10, February 2, 2022 (EST)

Honestly I think the articles might work split. But I think the small brown mushroom should probably be lumped in with the Spotcap. It's not that they are the same thing, but it's that it's a good article for the info to be in, similar to how juice information is in the fruit article. It could go under the minor obstacles article, but it's almost exactly the same thing as the Spotcap, just with a different coat of paint. Don't think it makes sense to create a section in the minor obstacles article that'll just copy-paste a chunk of the Spotcap article. — {Espyo^T} 14:16, February 7, 2022 (EST)

That much makes sense--split the Spotcap and Kingcap, but keep the strange brown mushrooms to the Spotcap's article. And obviously should the brown mushrooms be different enough somehow--like them having a wholly unique species name that Nintendo suddenly reveals--then it can be split to its own article. Obviously, I don't exactly have the power to split the articles, but I feel like people are more-or-less fine with splitting it, right? :O Camwoodstock (talk) 11:26, February 10, 2022 (EST)