Talk:Gattling Groink: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::Not everyone will type slowly enough for that to appear. It's better to be safe; there's no harm in having extra redirects. — [[User:Botanist|'''Botanist''']]<sub>[[User talk:Botanist|''(talk)'']]</sub> 03:41, July 27, 2021 (EDT) | ::::Not everyone will type slowly enough for that to appear. It's better to be safe; there's no harm in having extra redirects. — [[User:Botanist|'''Botanist''']]<sub>[[User talk:Botanist|''(talk)'']]</sub> 03:41, July 27, 2021 (EDT) | ||
:::::Alright, fair enough. {{User:Cheepy/sig}} |
Latest revision as of 13:15, July 27, 2021
Unlikely redirect[edit]
I mean, it was just removed from two locations on the wiki. Can't really call it "unlikely" :P — {EspyoT} 12:11, July 26, 2021 (EDT)
- Well, I know that. The point is that "Gattling" is a typo, and that this redirect was seldom used when its use was entirely unnecessary. ~ Cheepy (talk)
- Redirect pages aren't just for links, they're for searching. Some names are easy to misspell, and if someone searches an incorrectly spelled word, often the search page won't show the page they're looking for since the incorrectly spelled word appears nowhere in it. Typo redirects like this are important in making sure people searching for something can get to the page they're looking for. — Botanist(talk) 01:09, July 27, 2021 (EDT)