MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice: Difference between revisions
(Anons should be seeing the same notice, if anonnotice is not defined. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Interface/Sitenotice) |
Trig Jegman (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Many thanks for updating this, but it appears that logged out users still see the old message. I am guessing this is due to [[MediaWiki:Anonnotice]], which I assume needs seperate updating. Just leaving this here to let people know.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] ([[User talk:Vellidragon|talk]]) 19:21, 4 August 2013 (EDT) | Many thanks for updating this, but it appears that logged out users still see the old message. I am guessing this is due to [[MediaWiki:Anonnotice]], which I assume needs seperate updating. Just leaving this here to let people know.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] ([[User talk:Vellidragon|talk]]) 19:21, 4 August 2013 (EDT) | ||
== == | ==Should we add== | ||
Should we add something along the lines of '''''"Pikipedia has moved here. All edits should be made their instead. <big>Ad free, quicker, and more customizable.</big>"''''' | Should we add something along the lines of '''''"Pikipedia has moved here. All edits should be made their instead. <big>Ad free, quicker, and more customizable.</big>"''''' | ||
I think it would... motivate people to switch to the new Pikipedia. {{User:IAMAHIPO ocolor/sig}} 12:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC) | I think it would... motivate people to switch to the new Pikipedia. {{User:IAMAHIPO ocolor/sig}} 12:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Well, we hardly care about this one any more, so it's just a matter of warning people that it has moved. Nobody should stay here, and maybe we shouldn't say that the new one is better - it just moved. ...It's kind of hard to explain what I mean... '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 14:18, October 10, 2010 (UTC) | :Well, we hardly care about this one any more, so it's just a matter of warning people that it has moved. Nobody should stay here, and maybe we shouldn't say that the new one is better - it just moved. ...It's kind of hard to explain what I mean... '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 14:18, October 10, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:50, January 22, 2021
To update
In order to update the site's notice, follow this checklist.
- Edit this template.
- Edit anonymous user template if it's different.
- Increase the number on MediaWiki:Sitenotice id.
There, now we won't forget any steps in case we need to update this again. — {EspyoT} 15:17, 10 July 2015 (EDT)
NIWA
NintendoWiki is newer than Golden Sun Universe. --SnorlaxMonster 18:34, 19 December 2010 (EST)
- Yeah, it just doesn't seem like it for me since they've had it running for quite a while behind the scenes. GP
Pikmin 3 update
The site notice should probably be updated to reflect the European & Australian release of Pikmin 3. At the time of writing this, it only mentions the Japanese release.--Vellidragon (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2013 (EDT)
- Editing should wait, as the North American release is days away. Also, only admins can edit the SiteNotice as it's a MediaWiki page, but no admins are active ATM... ~PikFan23
- Well, it could be edited again when the NA version is released. It would make sense to me to keep the notice as up to date as possible if this is striving to become the primary source for Pikmin info, especially as there's no news section on the main page.--Vellidragon (talk) 00:22, 29 July 2013 (EDT)
Many thanks for updating this, but it appears that logged out users still see the old message. I am guessing this is due to MediaWiki:Anonnotice, which I assume needs seperate updating. Just leaving this here to let people know.--Vellidragon (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2013 (EDT)
Should we add
Should we add something along the lines of "Pikipedia has moved here. All edits should be made their instead. Ad free, quicker, and more customizable." I think it would... motivate people to switch to the new Pikipedia. IAMAHIPO_ocolor 12:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC)