21
edits
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Fruit: new section) |
||
Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
:Category in what sense? We already have a [[:category:obstacles]]. And with the grouping, do you mean in article text, where they're mentioned? I don't think that's something we need a standard for - you just use whatever seems the most natural when you're writing it. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 05:43, 8 July 2013 (EDT) | :Category in what sense? We already have a [[:category:obstacles]]. And with the grouping, do you mean in article text, where they're mentioned? I don't think that's something we need a standard for - you just use whatever seems the most natural when you're writing it. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 05:43, 8 July 2013 (EDT) | ||
== Fruit == | |||
Maybe things are more inactive here than I realize, but I personally believe that the Fruit pages should be a bit of a priority. Then again, maybe I am missing something. Thoughts? [[User:Joshduman|Joshduman]] ([[User talk:Joshduman|talk]]) 22:57, 4 November 2013 (EST) |
edits