Forum:Lock this wiki: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Adding comment.)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
I agree. This Wiki is not perfect by any means (I like to think it's close), so lock it we shall not.
I agree. This Wiki is not perfect by any means (I like to think it's close), so lock it we shall not.
Not that ''I'' can really decide that, but... '''[[User:Ridly|<span style="color:darkBlue;">Ridly</span>]] [[Image:Metroid.gif]] <small><sup>[[User Talk:Ridly|<span style="color:darkslateblue">Skree!</span>]]</sup></small>''' 20:07, 24 April 2011 (EDT)
Not that ''I'' can really decide that, but... '''[[User:Ridly|<span style="color:darkBlue;">Ridly</span>]] [[Image:Metroid.gif]] <small><sup>[[User Talk:Ridly|<span style="color:darkslateblue">Skree!</span>]]</sup></small>''' 20:07, 24 April 2011 (EDT)
:Not going to happen. Some edits spark a discussion that reveals something about the game. It's usually minor, but even 'stupid' edits will often force us to double check and find something we didn't expect (can't give you an example really; maybe the buried-larva-stun thing just now?). Plus, denying newcomers access to editing will usually make them feel unwanted, and some of them might decide to stay a while and become better writers. We're not exactly over-capacity with the vandals, even though they do seem to come in 'tides' now and then. It's just too radical a step for such small nuisances.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}}
578

edits