Forum:Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::Oh, then I believe we should. For the sake of organization, mostly. We have them categorized, but it's not the same thing. Besides, it wouldn't take up much space. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 17:17, 22 March 2011 (EDT) | :::Oh, then I believe we should. For the sake of organization, mostly. We have them categorized, but it's not the same thing. Besides, it wouldn't take up much space. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 17:17, 22 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
:::I say have all the notes and the same page as you said, and put a more generalized copyright notice on the top. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} |
Revision as of 19:08, March 22, 2011
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Notes
Currently, we have notes subpages for treasures (journal/pitch), enemies/plants (reel/Olimar's/Louie's) and ship parts (Olimar's descriptions when they're found/collected). We also have Olimar's Voyage Log and Olimar's monologues in Pikmin 1. Should the notes in these that correspond directly to a single article be placed on them like the other notes?
If so, should the notes we already have subpages for be collected on a single page (for each source) like these two pages, or should these two pages have the listings removed (leaving just short descriptions, like with the other notes)? GP
- Those two pages (Olimar's Voyage Log and Olimar's monologues in Pikmin 1) have all the notes on the same page. I'm saying, if we put a load of those notes in subpages, should the notes already in subpages (journal/sales pitch, etc.) be compiled into one page (Olimar's Journal, Sales Pitch, etc.) like that as well? Uh, ignore the part about removing the existing listings, since I just realised we wouldn't be able to use all the notes elsewhere anyway... GP