Talk:Counter glitch

Image:Proggglitch.JPG Man, I never thought this would become so popular. Should we redirect this? Or make a new page?--Prezintenden 08:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

What? Wait, why the link to the deleted image, and how is it popular? Oh, I get it; it's something you found before. Er, still needs rewriting.GP 08:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Whoops, my bad. Forgot to change this one. Yeah, I was surprised that more people are finding this. Wait, no, not surprised. Uh, uh... intrigued. Yeah, that's it.--Prezintenden

Glitch Question

The article says it should be standing at the landing area after the egg disappears. Do they mean stand as in stay in the same spot, or do they mean standing as in it sits there for a second, and then starts to walk around? ~SwordFile:SK.PNGKnight~ 02:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Renaming

Should we rename it to 'counter glitch', seeing as it can also happen in Forest Navel and presumably other places? Or should we shorten it and put it on the Progg and FN pages?--Prezintenden

Yeah, based on second paragraph saying you don't need the Progg, I'd say so. It may as well keep its own article, though. GP

So apparently certain people who actually don't know what they are talking about think that we should keep this as an article because people seem to encounter this quite often. I'd rename this to 'Counter glitch' and keep it as a page and add the more general variation of Pikmin death glitching it. Any additional thoughts on this?--Prezintenden

That was a bit confusing. They don't know what they're talking about, about keeping this as an article, but you're suggesting keeping it as an article? Either way, it's been pretty much unanimous here and on the chatroom that this is renamed to "counter glitch". {Espyo^T} 19:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)

I was joking and referring to GP, who was going at this with a bit of a flawed logic (IIRC, but I'm not sure anymore), and with the 'keep as a page' I was basically agreeing to keep it as an article, nothing else. Renaming and rewriting now, then, I guess.--Prezintenden

Meh, I would't use {{title}} on glitch pages, 'cause it's pretty obvious they're not going to have official names. Objections to removing? GP

It's not too important. We either add that template to all glitch articles, for completion's sake, or leave it absent from all articles. I say we add them. Also helps make some pages feel less bland. We have some glitch articles that are just a small wall of text. {Espyo^T} 12:46, 9 March 2011 (EST)

Mrglbh... It seems wrong to have them. The glitches will never have a true name, unlike the things we otherwise use the template for (such as gates and the figwort bugs, which certainly have some software-esque name and the potential to be named in Pikmin 3). They're not even intended to be 'canon'. I don't know, I'm against using it.--Prezintenden

Less

I was in the Glutton's Kitchen and in the sublevel 5, It counted 99/100 and i had all of them. is this a bit the same thing?