Talk:Skitter Leaf: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::::If it follows the definition, we should add it. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | :::::If it follows the definition, we should add it. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | ||
I agree with Vol.Though we can change the category name to"enemies harmless to pikmin".--[[User:Man-at-Legs888|Man-at-Legs888]] 00:23, 24 February 2011 (EST) | I agree with Vol.Though we can change the category name to:"enemies harmless to pikmin".--[[User:Man-at-Legs888|Man-at-Legs888]] 00:23, 24 February 2011 (EST) |
Revision as of 00:31, February 24, 2011
I don't think this should be in the harmless enemy category cause it can hurt captains when it shakes.It causes a very small amount of damage but its still damage.--Man-at-Legs888 05:30, 22 February 2011 (EST)
- Well, it's a bit subjective. One can call harmless to an enemy that can deliver absolutely no damage, an enemy that can only damage captains, an enemy that can only shake off Pikmin, an enemy that can do several weird things, but not kill them, or any combination. So it's not too important. I think that in this wiki, "harmless enemies" are the ones that can't kill Pikmin directly. {EspyoT} 07:30, 22 February 2011 (EST)
- Yeah, I'd say it's harmless enough to fit in here. It's just such minor damage. It's really less of a threat than the Antenna Beetle.--Prezintenden
- Yeah, putting it in the category is in agreement with the description on the category page. GP
I agree with Vol.Though we can change the category name to:"enemies harmless to pikmin".--Man-at-Legs888 00:23, 24 February 2011 (EST)