Forum:Wiki description thing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Prezintenden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
I agree. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | I agree. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | ||
:Sounds fine.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} |
Revision as of 13:55, October 7, 2010
See my talk. Here's a quick(-ish) idea of what I think should be in it; give ideas and such.
"The Pikmin series follows Captain Olimar's encounters with aliens called Pikmin over two games. Pikipedia (*), founded by Dark Lord Revan as a Wikia wiki in December 2005, aims to be the foremost source of Pikmin information. In September 2010, Pikipedia moved away from Wikia to become independent. With the release of a third Pikmin title imminent, there's no better place to be."
* The other ones have an abbreviation here. Discussion I had on it:
[19:25:19] <Jimbo_Jambo> Do we need one? [19:25:32] <Greenpickle> Iunno, just noticed the others had one [19:25:36] <Jimbo_Jambo> Mm [19:25:39] <Greenpickle> there must be some reason [19:25:49] <-> Miles_ is now known as The_Wiki_Confederacy [19:25:57] <Jimbo_Jambo> Ease of use? [19:26:01] <Jimbo_Jambo> God dammit Miles [19:26:11] <Jimbo_Jambo> Stop making fun of my overactive imagination [19:26:28] <Jimbo_Jambo> Unfortunately our name is all one work [19:26:49] <Jimbo_Jambo> We don't have the luxury of being able to abbreviate "Pikmin Wiki" as PW or something like that [19:27:20] <Jimbo_Jambo> But then again Bulbapedia did it [19:27:38] <Jimbo_Jambo> Following their example it would seem like PP would be most appropriate [19:27:49] <Jimbo_Jambo> But I dunno, it just doesn't sound...us [19:27:56] <Greenpickle> ...Miles [19:28:11] <Greenpickle> ease of use of what? [19:28:18] <Greenpickle> ...is 'P' fine? [19:28:29] <Jimbo_Jambo> Instead of typing out "Zelda Wiki" or whatever every time [19:28:31] <Jimbo_Jambo> P [19:28:32] <Jimbo_Jambo> Haha [19:28:34] <Greenpickle> I just saw the one-word Bulbapedia used 2 symbols too [19:28:42] <Jimbo_Jambo> Yeah [19:28:54] <Jimbo_Jambo> As I said [19:28:56] <Greenpickle> oh, qust read you said that [19:28:59] <Greenpickle> *just [19:29:02] <Greenpickle> hadn't got there [19:29:03] <Jimbo_Jambo> Right [19:29:15] <Jimbo_Jambo> We've never really used one though [19:29:19] <Jimbo_Jambo> Not that I recall [19:29:36] <Jimbo_Jambo> We could call it PIK [19:29:36] <Greenpickle> I would say Pk, lower-case k, is closer to the word [19:29:41] <Jimbo_Jambo> Mm [19:29:56] <Greenpickle> but yes, P is, above all, different. [19:30:10] <Jimbo_Jambo> Who's gonna use that though? [19:30:15] <Greenpickle> heheh [19:30:20] <Jimbo_Jambo> "Yeah, I read on P that Pikmin 3 is coming out" [19:30:35] <Jimbo_Jambo> "I'm an active contributor on P" [19:30:44] <Greenpickle> oh yes [19:30:47] <Greenpickle> perfect [19:31:49] <Jimbo_Jambo> "Pkmn", not to be confused with the abbreviation for Pokemon [19:33:05] <Greenpickle> well, people say 'wiki' [19:33:09] <Greenpickle> so...'piki'? [19:33:10] <Greenpickle> ... [19:33:32] <Jimbo_Jambo> Heh [19:34:15] <Jimbo_Jambo> I think we should first check whether or not an abbreviation is actually necessary [19:34:27] <Jimbo_Jambo> Unless you just really want to have one [19:35:21] <Greenpickle> yeah [19:35:38] <Greenpickle> I'll ask the guy
I have indeed asked the guy. Also, could the last sentence could do with some sort of extension? GP
And the response:
"I suppose you could decide on it yourselves, but when we use interwiki links. Like say a pikmin cameo is in Kirby's Epic Yarn, instead of linking to Wikipedia for our readers to get more info on Pikmin, I'd use {{PKW|Olimar}} and that would go to the Olimar article you have. It's not entirely consistent."
I suggest 'PK', then; anyone else agree/disagree? GP
- Sounds fine.--Prezintenden