Talk:Seesaw block: Difference between revisions
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== It's Featured, Yay! == | == It's Featured, Yay! == | ||
But there should be a box that says "This is a currently featured article until May 15th, 2009" {{User:Redpikminflamethrower/Sig}} | But there should be a box that says "This is a currently featured article until May 15th, 2009" {{User:Redpikminflamethrower/Sig}} | ||
== Eh... slight name change... == | == Eh... slight name change... == | ||
I think it would be best to change this article's name to '''Stone scale'''. I mean... it's like, more appropriate, and stuff. Just... yeah. What do you think? <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 07:29, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | I think it would be best to change this article's name to '''Stone scale'''. I mean... it's like, more appropriate, and stuff. Just... yeah. What do you think? <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 07:29, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I can't say I really oppose, but is it necessary? {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 17:12, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | :I can't say I really oppose, but is it necessary? {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 17:12, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, I believe so. It's a more suiting name for the article tbh. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 18:13, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | ::Yes, I believe so. It's a more suiting name for the article tbh. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 18:13, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
I think they're wooden.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} |
Revision as of 10:59, June 15, 2010
Actually, I thought they are out of stone... Either way, would "scale block" sound better?--Prezintenden(babble)
I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. Me_just_in16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. Are they really stone?GP
I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale.
Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it.
Ok. did it. Now, I am new, someone please direct Block, scale block, wooden block, stone block, wooden square, stone square, scale square, ect. to scale?
I think we should have a page like this one I found at another wiki, for cases like this.GP
I agree. ocolor 02:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
It's Featured, Yay!
But there should be a box that says "This is a currently featured article until May 15th, 2009" I'm RedpikminFlamethrower And I approve this message.
Eh... slight name change...
I think it would be best to change this article's name to Stone scale. I mean... it's like, more appropriate, and stuff. Just... yeah. What do you think? BNK [E|T|C] 07:29, June 13, 2010 (UTC)