Talk:Pikmin habits: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Snakeboss14 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Merge...but don't delete.--[[File:Images.ijpg|50px]] the master --[[User:MewFan128|MewFan128]] 02:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | Merge...but don't delete.--[[File:Images.ijpg|50px]] the master --[[User:MewFan128|MewFan128]] 02:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Merge! I have already seen this information in other articles. It doesn't deserve its own article. {{User:Snakeboss14/sig}} |
Revision as of 16:20, June 23, 2009
Uh, I'm not sure this information warrants its own article. In fact, most of it has already been stated on other pages, Pikmin Family in particular. —Jimbo Jambo
I agree with JJ, this is pointless. it and Pikmin Extinction should be merged with the main family page. I am rocky0718 and i PWN
To save time/bordom, i will merge them all. I am rocky0718 and i PWN Unless someone is against it...
ok, give me 15 minutes to edit and stuff. I am rocky0718 and i PWN
I'm AGAINST IT!--
the master --MewFan128 14:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 01:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- Re-opening discussion on this again, then, I guess. I agree that this should be merged into Pikmin family. Does anyone agree?GP
I though it was going to be deleted... what's an edit conflict?--
the master --MewFan128 14:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 21:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- An edit conflict is where someone has edited the page you're editing since you started editing, so it's changed. And I thought it would make sense to take what's useful from here and keep it - I don't know, maybe it's already on the other page, in which case it would just be a deletion.GP
me agree Rpwyb
I had one on this page with Rpwyb.--
the master --MewFan128 14:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 22:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge...but don't delete.--File:Images.ijpg the master --MewFan128 02:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge! I have already seen this information in other articles. It doesn't deserve its own article. Snakeboss14