Talk:Libra glitch

I believe this was separated from the article before and we chose to put it in the main article. I think that, since this page is so short, it should be made a redirect to that part of the article.GP

I agree I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

Unless this redirect is going to be categorized under Glitches, it should probably be deleted, and links redirected to the Libra article. —Jimbo Jambo 21:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I think this is more for if people are searching 'Libra glitch', in which case they're sent to the right page via this one.GP

Why would someone search for that? This is the place they would most likely hear about it first. Also, we could categorize the redirect as such. We wouldn't have a useless article, but it would still be easy for someone looking for glitches to find. —Jimbo Jambo 18:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

The same reason we have prezidant... well it was some odd redirect... that I don't know how to spell. Ah, Prez knows...I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

...Are you suggesting someone could misspell "Libra" as "Libra Glitch"? —Jimbo Jambo 20:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

No, no... I'm saying someone has or is bound to search for it... I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

Yeah, there's no problem with having a redirect, right? And what you're saying about categorising it - would that work for a redirect? Would it make sense? Should 'Libra glitch' not be the one categorised in that way instead?GP

Yes categorize Libra Glitc than redirect to Libra... I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.