Talk:Grub-dog family: Difference between revisions
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:I'm getting the game in a few days (NTSC version) (NPC = Non Playable Character?) I'll check but, I'm pretty sure we have a nutcase IP... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | :I'm getting the game in a few days (NTSC version) (NPC = Non Playable Character?) I'll check but, I'm pretty sure we have a nutcase IP... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | ||
::New Play Control. And it's good someone here will be getting it; I personally don't think it's worth it, and my money's better spent on new games. They'd better hurry up with Pikmin 3...{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 15:25, March 16, 2009
Hey...I think it's great to have the concept art here, but could we leave the screenshots on the actual pages? It's kind of boring with no variety in the images, and I think it's nice to see what creatures look like in the game too, not just what they're supposed to look like. —Jimbo Jambo
I know but the wiki needs to be clean and concept art from the game is easier to use since they are smaller and don't stretch the screen much. Spotty Bulbear 22:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Concept art can be just as big as screenshots, and the resolution can be tricky to deal with if you don't get the right image. Plus, you can always take smaller screenshots if the ones you have are too big. I think the concept art is fine, I just don't think it's attractive, or even particularly useful, to have the same image on every page. —Jimbo Jambo
This edit
I don't have the NPC version, but it seems strange. Is it correct, or is this editor crazy?GP
