Talk:Blaxcaps: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jimbo Jambo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Prezintenden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::::Sorry, but I've got to agree with green. The only thing that's really similar about them is their shape, but everything else - color, habitat, even game, is different. I think the mention on the Bulblax article is sufficient. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 22:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC) | ::::Sorry, but I've got to agree with green. The only thing that's really similar about them is their shape, but everything else - color, habitat, even game, is different. I think the mention on the Bulblax article is sufficient. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 22:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::So yeah, just compared both types; they look nothing alike.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} |
Revision as of 15:32, June 11, 2010
Eh... —Jimbo Jambo 15:19, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
Should we delete this page? If we let it stay, should we remove the conjecture tag at the top of the page as the term "blaxcap" was used by Prima? Wait...is Prima considered offical? Pikmin1254
- Did Prima actually mention them? I've actually always wondered what Prima's "official" status was. —Jimbo Jambo 03:49, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
I agree with Greenpickle. Snakeboss14
- Also add to Common Glowcap? The article could use some expanding; although I'm not sure if something as random as this is the right thing.--Prezintenden
- Well, the idea isn't that absurd that we couldn't make a whole sentence out of it. I'll check tomorrow.--Prezintenden
- So yeah, just compared both types; they look nothing alike.--Prezintenden