User talk:Bossclips: Difference between revisions
(→Bulbear mistake: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Campground area is fine, talking about the beach area. Unless you can ''cite a source'', the name "Serene Shores" has not be publicly revealed at all. - Bossclips | Campground area is fine, talking about the beach area. Unless you can ''cite a source'', the name "Serene Shores" has not be publicly revealed at all. - Bossclips | ||
== Bulbear mistake == | |||
"It is a mistake if they are supposed to be younger versions of the adults ones, which would make them the same species." My point is that the scientific names don't contradict the fact they are the same species. If ''Oculus terribilis dotticum'' is a subspecies of ''Oculus terribilis'', then we can assume the Bulbear, Dwarf or otherwise, is both. It's like "''Homo sapiens''" and "''Homo sapiens sapiens''". The inconsistency is probably unintentional, but it's not wrong. [[User:2 B|2 B]] ([[User talk:2 B|talk]]) | |||
Revision as of 13:09, July 11, 2023
Hey.
I am sorry. I did not know. I am fairly new and should have paid more attention to the topic. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 45.27.89.141 • (talk) • (contribs)
- np, just correcting a mistake. dont let that discourage you from doing more edits. -Bossclips
Campground Area
That was not leaked, it was confirmed it the new trailer AND the Japanese shorts, there is an entire short on nintendo japan dedicated to that area, its NOT leaked, so it should be allowed. - PikminLover4587
Campground area is fine, talking about the beach area. Unless you can cite a source, the name "Serene Shores" has not be publicly revealed at all. - Bossclips
Bulbear mistake
"It is a mistake if they are supposed to be younger versions of the adults ones, which would make them the same species." My point is that the scientific names don't contradict the fact they are the same species. If Oculus terribilis dotticum is a subspecies of Oculus terribilis, then we can assume the Bulbear, Dwarf or otherwise, is both. It's like "Homo sapiens" and "Homo sapiens sapiens". The inconsistency is probably unintentional, but it's not wrong. 2 B (talk)