Pikipedia talk:Featured article: Difference between revisions
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Right, I've made a few changes. There's the featured article header template at template:featured, the current featured article is always at template:feature, and this page has changed; and I created Pikmin:Featured articles/nominations.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 19:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | ::Right, I've made a few changes. There's the featured article header template at template:featured, the current featured article is always at template:feature, and this page has changed; and I created Pikmin:Featured articles/nominations.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 19:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
Okay, I think it's time to choose a new feature from the four on the nominations page. Might be easier if people actually opposed those they won't support rather than being nice.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 18:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:15, May 8, 2008
Very helpful article. Hopefully, we get some users to submit some cool featured Pikmin articles if possible.
Okay, since we're now not using a rotation, should this be changed? Should we set up a system whereby articles can be nominated to be featured? We would just set up a page for people to edit with their nominations, and change the article to a new popular one when it's getting old (maybe at Pikmin: Featured articles/nominations). Also, I'd like to have a record of what's been featured here, something like:
- Perplexing Pool
- 30th March 2008 - 18th April 2008
- 8-day run
- 18th April 2008 -
Hm? Also, is there any possible appropriate image for the current feature? It needs one.GP 08:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm on it. And a "yes" to all the other stuff.--Prezintenden
- Okay, seeing as featured articles now just use the introductory paragraph or so from the main article, there's no point in creating a page for them; just have it at template:feature and change that text. I'm going to set that up now; what I want to know is the opinion on what should be done with the other featured articles and the rotation page.GP 18:18, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I think it's time to choose a new feature from the four on the nominations page. Might be easier if people actually opposed those they won't support rather than being nice.GP 18:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)