Talk:Olimar's monologs

Could we change the yellow color to something a little more visible? I have trouble reading it. Pikdude 22:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

That's apparently the color it is listed in the game so I doubt they'll change it.--FREAK ~Game Freak~OUT!

Liek this???? IAMAHIPO_ocolor 01:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, that color's better, but you may want to confront with Greenpickle about that.--FREAK ~Game Freak~OUT!

Sometimes I get confused and I think letters in green are links to other pages. Snakeboss14

Yeah, so do I, we should change them to blue/purple or another color related to green.--FREAK ~Game Freak~OUT!

But I think it was like that to show how it looks in the game? I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

Yea, it is. RWAR! ~JOSHAFile:Gozira.PNGZILLA!!!~ AND IMAFIRINMAHLAZOR!!!

It's a little hard to read, is all I'm saying. Maybe a slightly darker yellow? Like mustard color?Pikdude 16:45, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

IDK, ask Prez or Green I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

Mm. It's obviously okay in-game because of the different BG colour; maybe we could change it. It's currently yellow - maybe this? But seriously, don't ask me about colour; I'm colour-blind.GP

Oh right... OK #aa0 it is! I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

Use the mustard yellow thing that Green suggested.Pikdude 19:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you? I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

Ah hah, I use the same exact color and no one says use it, then green picks one, and everyone uses it :/ </rant> Oh, andd Green is color blind? Green. Color blind. hah hah... IAMAHIPO_ocolor 06:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey, GameFreak liked it (though it's not exactly the same colour, I can't see much difference). I'll change it in the article, then.GP

Well I see I missed this converstion... I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.

Yes, that's much better, much more readable now. Pikdude 21:59, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Add info to other articles

We should add monologues to pages that share a subject with them, in a similar fashion to how the Voyage Log entries about enemies are on the enemy pages. We should also do this with some of the non-enemy Voyage Log entries. Vol (Talk)

Agreed. Although I feel as if this project will eventually be forgotten, so I'll add it to the current projects page. Also, we need to organize the notes better. I, for instance, looked at the Fiery Blowhog page, and noticed that only the Ship's Log info and "Notes" have lines under them. And the reel notes are mixed with the Pikmin 2 Piklopedia notes. Fixing the notes template should be done now, but the other project might take some time. {Espyo^T} 10:22, 22 March 2011 (EDT)

Yeah, we need to think about all the notes we could have, the best names, where they should be, etc.. I'll try to get around to starting a forum topic later today to discuss it all. GP

Change title

As shown here, all instances of "Pikmin 1" should be changed to "Pikmin". However, I cannot find how to change the title of a page. Can someone help? Emperor Bulblax 23:14, 24 February 2012 (EST)

See Pikipedia:General content guidelines#"Pikmin 1". For future reference, though, once your account is 'autoconfirmed', you will be able to move pages (rename them) by clicking the 'move' tab at the top. This happens when your account is 4 days old and you've made 10 edits. GP 06:11, 25 February 2012 (EST)

Regardless, the Game names project in the link states that Pikmin 1 should be renamed 'Pikmin'. Emperor Bulblax 09:54, 26 February 2012 (EST)

Doesn't matter, the policies speak higher. I even updated the project so that it reflects that. {Espyo^T} 11:27, 26 February 2012 (EST)

The article still hasn't been moved... It seems like a good thing to do. - Botanist (talk) 05:57, October 10, 2020 (EDT)

Viewing

What software was used to view the text files?--NintendoFan369 (talk) 11:15, 24 May 2014 (EDT)

I'm not sure, but it is possible to view the logs and their respective filenames using the debug menu (check TCRF). — {Espyo^T} 11:34, 24 May 2014 (EDT)

Links

I reverted an edit that linked to the ship parts and such on the section headers. The policy states we can't have links on section headers. Any idea on an alternative? Or we could just leave it linkless. — {Espyo^T} 04:55, 24 April 2015 (EDT)

Would putting a "Main article: (name of link)" thing below the section headers (such as what is seen here for example) solve the problem? — Mariotime315 ^{Let's-a go!}

I don't know... the page is already formatting-heavy as-is. Adding in a pretty block of text with italics and indentation and all just to link to an article seems like overkill. It might be better to just let this article serve as an archive of quotes and nothing else... — {Espyo^T} 16:04, 25 November 2016 (EST)

The full text rips

These are the "tu_tx"-tagged files ripped though dataDir/screen/eng_blo folder using Notepad++, now complete in its full glory: tu_tx[all]_clean As it was ripped before, I tried to fix a few mistakes but everything is as untouched as it is. AnonBaiter (talk) 11:38, 9 September 2015 (EDT)

EDIT: Here it is, the remaining rips: auf_[all]_clean, ufo_[all]_clean.