Forum:Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} Currently, we have notes subpages for treasures (journal/pitch), enemies/plants (reel/Olimar's/Louie's) and ship parts (Olimar's descriptions when th...") |
m (Text replacement - "User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2" to "User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig") |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}} | {{Forumheader|Watercooler}} | ||
Currently, we have notes subpages for treasures (journal/pitch), enemies/plants (reel/Olimar's/Louie's) and ship parts (Olimar's descriptions when they're found/collected). We also have [[Olimar's Voyage Log]] and [[Olimar's | Currently, we have notes subpages for treasures (journal/pitch), enemies/plants (reel/Olimar's/Louie's) and ship parts (Olimar's descriptions when they're found/collected). We also have [[Olimar's Voyage Log]] and [[Olimar's monologs]]. Should the notes in these that correspond directly to a single article be placed on them like the other notes? | ||
If so, should the notes we already have subpages for be collected on a single page (for each source) like these two pages, or should these two pages have the listings removed (leaving just short descriptions, like with the other notes)? <span style="font-family:times;">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#080;">G</span>]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050;">P</span>]]'''''</span> | If so, should the notes we already have subpages for be collected on a single page (for each source) like these two pages, or should these two pages have the listings removed (leaving just short descriptions, like with the other notes)? <span style="font-family:times;">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#080;">G</span>]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050;">P</span>]]'''''</span> | ||
:Would you mind explaining that second paragraph better, Green? '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 16:15, 22 March 2011 (EDT) | |||
::Those two pages ([[Olimar's Voyage Log]] and [[Olimar's monologs]]) have all the notes on the same page. I'm saying, if we put a load of those notes in subpages, should the notes already in subpages (journal/sales pitch, etc.) be compiled into one page ([[Olimar's Journal]], [[Sales Pitch]], etc.) like that as well? Uh, ignore the part about removing the existing listings, since I just realised we wouldn't be able to use all the notes elsewhere anyway... <span style="font-family:times;">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#080;">G</span>]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050;">P</span>]]'''''</span> | |||
:::Oh, then I believe we should. For the sake of organization, mostly. We have them categorized, but it's not the same thing. Besides, it wouldn't take up much space. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 17:17, 22 March 2011 (EDT) | |||
:::I say have all the notes and the same page as you said, and put a more generalized copyright notice on the top. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:51, July 4, 2024
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Notes
Currently, we have notes subpages for treasures (journal/pitch), enemies/plants (reel/Olimar's/Louie's) and ship parts (Olimar's descriptions when they're found/collected). We also have Olimar's Voyage Log and Olimar's monologs. Should the notes in these that correspond directly to a single article be placed on them like the other notes?
If so, should the notes we already have subpages for be collected on a single page (for each source) like these two pages, or should these two pages have the listings removed (leaving just short descriptions, like with the other notes)? GP
- Those two pages (Olimar's Voyage Log and Olimar's monologs) have all the notes on the same page. I'm saying, if we put a load of those notes in subpages, should the notes already in subpages (journal/sales pitch, etc.) be compiled into one page (Olimar's Journal, Sales Pitch, etc.) like that as well? Uh, ignore the part about removing the existing listings, since I just realised we wouldn't be able to use all the notes elsewhere anyway... GP