Talk:Seesaw block: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Espyo moved page Talk:Seesaw Block to Talk:Seesaw block: Policy.) |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. {{User:Me_just_in/sig}}16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC) | I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. {{User:Me_just_in/sig}}16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. | Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. Are they really stone?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale. | I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale. | ||
:Oh, I get it now, as in balancing scales. | :Oh, I get it now, as in balancing scales. What about 'block scales', then?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it. | Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it. | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I agree. [[User:IAMAHIPO ocolor|ocolor]] 02:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | I agree. [[User:IAMAHIPO ocolor|ocolor]] 02:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
== It's Featured, Yay! == | |||
But there should be a box that says "This is a currently featured article until May 15th, 2009" {{User:Redpikminflamethrower/Sig}} | |||
== Eh... slight name change... == | |||
I think it would be best to change this article's name to '''Stone scale'''. I mean... it's like, more appropriate, and stuff. Just... yeah. What do you think? <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 07:29, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:I can't say I really oppose, but is it necessary? {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 17:12, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Yes, I believe so. It's a more suiting name for the article tbh. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 18:13, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | |||
I think they're wooden.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | |||
:They're shaped like a stone, but the texture on them certainly looks like some sort of pale wood. I wouldn't be too certain.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} | |||
::I was thinking the sound they make is more of a giveaway.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | |||
:::So it may be petrified wood. Even so, petrified wood is stone. I'm about to make the move. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 01:25, June 16, 2010 (UTC) | |||
No, you are not. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig}} | |||
:Well, since your .ogg file isn't working for me Green, I'll have to do it the hard way and play the game to find out what sound it is. --{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | |||
::You have the proper OGG codecs do play it, right? If not you ought to download them, since wikis use OGG pretty much exclusively. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 02:58, June 19, 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Comment by Mampharos on 7th July 2014 == | |||
should this be deleted? its a redirect to a page that doesnt exist - [[User:Mampharos|Mampharos]] ([[User talk:Mampharos|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mampharos|contribs]]) | |||
== Comment by Mampharos on 7th July 2014 == | |||
On another note, why dont we have a page on this subject? it seems notable enough to deserve one - [[User:Mampharos|Mampharos]] ([[User talk:Mampharos|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mampharos|contribs]]) |
Latest revision as of 10:25, February 19, 2015
Actually, I thought they are out of stone... Either way, would "scale block" sound better?--Prezintenden(babble)
I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. Me_just_in16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. Are they really stone?GP
I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale.
Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it.
Ok. did it. Now, I am new, someone please direct Block, scale block, wooden block, stone block, wooden square, stone square, scale square, ect. to scale?
I think we should have a page like this one I found at another wiki, for cases like this.GP
I agree. ocolor 02:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
It's Featured, Yay![edit]
But there should be a box that says "This is a currently featured article until May 15th, 2009" I'm RedpikminFlamethrower And I approve this message.
Eh... slight name change...[edit]
I think it would be best to change this article's name to Stone scale. I mean... it's like, more appropriate, and stuff. Just... yeah. What do you think? BNK [E|T|C] 07:29, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
- They're shaped like a stone, but the texture on them certainly looks like some sort of pale wood. I wouldn't be too certain.--Prezintenden
- Well, since your .ogg file isn't working for me Green, I'll have to do it the hard way and play the game to find out what sound it is. --FREAK ~Game Freak~OUT!
Comment by Mampharos on 7th July 2014[edit]
should this be deleted? its a redirect to a page that doesnt exist - Mampharos (talk • contribs)
Comment by Mampharos on 7th July 2014[edit]
On another note, why dont we have a page on this subject? it seems notable enough to deserve one - Mampharos (talk • contribs)