Talk:Glowcap family: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (6 revisions) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It's standard to give them all the heading 'plants', else we'd have to call them 'group of things that are mostly plants, but some of which are other things like electronic components'...{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | :It's standard to give them all the heading 'plants', else we'd have to call them 'group of things that are mostly plants, but some of which are other things like electronic components'...{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
::Yes, a 'fungi' heading, besides being really small, would be less effective. {{User:Snakeboss14/sig}} | |||
oh I see--[[User:Man-at-Legs888|Man-at-Legs888]] 15:46, December 1, 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:31, September 16, 2010
The Common Glowcap is not a plant its a fungus--Man-at-Legs888 21:37, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
The Glowstem on the other hand is not a plant or a fungus but we already know that--Man-at-Legs888 21:53, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- It's standard to give them all the heading 'plants', else we'd have to call them 'group of things that are mostly plants, but some of which are other things like electronic components'...GP
oh I see--Man-at-Legs888 15:46, December 1, 2009 (UTC)