Talk:Figwort family: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 11:57, December 31, 2016

Could the Figwort possibly be related to the Pikmin? There is a bit of evidence. What family is the Chaenostoma cordatum in, in real life? Exactly... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrophulariaceae — Mariotime315 ^{Let's-a go!} 23:02, 2 November 2016 (EDT)

Nicely caught! I'll add that to the relevant pages. — {Espyo^T} 11:57, 31 December 2016 (EST)

Revision as of 22:02, November 2, 2016 (edit) Mariotime315 (talk \| contribs) (Hmm...)		Latest revision as of 11:57, December 31, 2016 (edit) (undo) Espyo (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Could the Figwort possibly be related to the Pikmin? There is a bit of evidence. What family is the ''[[Chaenostoma cordatum]]'' in, in real life? Exactly... [http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrophulariaceae en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrophulariaceae] {{User:Mariotime315/sig}} 23:02, 2 November 2016 (EDT)		Could the Figwort possibly be related to the Pikmin? There is a bit of evidence. What family is the ''[[Chaenostoma cordatum]]'' in, in real life? Exactly... [http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrophulariaceae en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrophulariaceae] {{User:Mariotime315/sig}} 23:02, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
			:Nicely caught! I'll add that to the relevant pages. — '''{''[[User:Espyo\|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo\|T]]</sup>}''' 11:57, 31 December 2016 (EST)