Talk:E3play 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::I don't see that it matters either way. I say feel free to move it. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 07:57, 29 May 2012 (EDT) | ::I don't see that it matters either way. I say feel free to move it. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 07:57, 29 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
:::Agreed. We don't have any confirmation from Nintendo saying that X was the original test map, and Y was an accidental dupe, so either title works. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 13:30, 30 May 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 12:30, May 30, 2012
Name
The page title is E3_play3, the first line says E3_Play3, and the video shows E3play_3. I'm more inclined to trust the video, but I want to know why we have three different names. --SnorlaxMonster 11:41, 28 April 2011 (EDT)
- Now that you mentioned it, I don't know where E3_play3 came from. In the game's files, there is one called E3play_3 and another called play_3 (as far as I know). Gabriel created this page, maybe he had a reason for its name? I say we rename it, and if Gabriel disagrees, he can write why here. {EspyoT} 11:54, 28 April 2011 (EDT)
play_3
Since this article is about both E3play_3 and play_3, I think the name play_3 would be more appropriate, since it is in both of their names. Is there any reason E3play_3 should take priority? --SnorlaxMonster 03:56, 26 May 2012 (EDT)