Notes talk:Eternal Fuel Dynamo/monolog: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (moved Talk:Eternal Fuel Dynamo/monolog to Notes talk:Eternal Fuel Dynamo/monolog: migrating to notes namespace) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::::So? {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | ::::So? {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | ||
:::::Yeah you're right, I said it first technically so I win...--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | |||
::::::Heh, Heh Green lost... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | |||
:::::::::::::::::Exactly! [[User:Pikdude|<span style="color:blue">Pik</span>]][[User talk:Pikdude|<span style="color:green">dude</span>]][[Image:200px-Mario you phail.gif|50px]] 19:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
[http://pikmin.wikia.com/index.php?diff=46436][http://pikmin.wikia.com/index.php?diff=46212]. Not to mention that in [http://pikmin.wikia.com/index.php?diff=46527] I said something different entirely. | |||
...{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | |||
:Darn it! {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} |
Latest revision as of 09:59, March 16, 2012
I think that these notes pages should be merged with the actual article itself. Merge to Eternal Fuel Dynamo Alpheta 19:11, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- No; they're separate so that anyone editing the page will realise they're in-game material (...hopefully). If they were in the actual articles, people would probably edit them.GP
- But this information is already included in the actual article. Alpheta 19:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Um, you do know there is a history button, right? Alpheta 19:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Can't you just write it down on paper or something!? Alpheta 19:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Paper is all too destructible. This way, we'll be able to get- well, like I said, ask Crys.
Pikdude 19:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, cant you type it down on Notepad or Microsoft Word? Alpheta 19:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- This is templated so that it is unavaible to edit on the Eternal Fuel Dynamo page (N00bs are less likely to find sub-pages) and keeps the notes, edit free. I'm ~LonelyTurret~ And I approve this message.
...
If people could 'hack' Mediawiki, Wikipedia would have died multiple times. It hasn't. And it doesn't matter that we can easily revert changes to notes if they're on the pages: the problem is that that takes work. It's better if people just don't have the chance to make that edit.GP
[1][2]. Not to mention that in [3] I said something different entirely.