Template talk:Image: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


:::::I actually thought about that one, but the thing is that while that's very lowres, it's probably the best quality image we can get about that critter. So using it for this template would sort of be ironic... Maybe that makes it work even better? '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 19:30, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
:::::I actually thought about that one, but the thing is that while that's very lowres, it's probably the best quality image we can get about that critter. So using it for this template would sort of be ironic... Maybe that makes it work even better? '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 19:30, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
::::::What am I missing?  What relation does that have to missing images? <span style="font-family:times;">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#080;">G</span>]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050;">P</span>]]'''''</span>

Revision as of 04:27, March 23, 2011

We definitely need a better image than File:Pikminwhiteimageneeded.jpg. a) It should have a transparent background. b) It should be as least edited as possible; this one was clearly edited to add a question mark to the White Pikmin's hand. {EspyoT} 10:00, 3 March 2011 (EST)

What's wrong with it looking edited? IIRC, Prez added that specifically for it to fit better with the template. Anyway, I can't really think of anything that would make sense - any ideas? GP
I guess I was a bit aggressive... It's just that, at Carmageddon Wikia, I cleverly used non-edited images from the games themselves. For instance, in the case of the more/better images template, I used an image of the second game's main vehicle, but with a lower-res polygon, as to reflect the potentially low quality of the pictures in the article. I guess I meant that if we can find an unedited image that is somehow related to pictures, or the lack thereof, we can replace it with that White Pikmin. Still, someone who knows how could delete the background from the White Pikmin image, for aesthetic reasons. {EspyoT} 17:28, 3 March 2011 (EST)
Oops, I missed this somehow. Yeah, sounds like a good idea, just need to find one. GP
Perhaps this image? Vol (Talk)
I actually thought about that one, but the thing is that while that's very lowres, it's probably the best quality image we can get about that critter. So using it for this template would sort of be ironic... Maybe that makes it work even better? {EspyoT} 19:30, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
What am I missing? What relation does that have to missing images? GP