Talk:Reference: Difference between revisions
m (Talk:Cameos moved to Talk:Pikameos: Better name.) |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Should the origins of [[Olimar]] and [[Louie]]'s names be here? | Should the origins of [[Olimar]] and [[Louie]]'s names be here? | ||
:Not sure; seems mostly to only refer to brands so far, which aren't really cameos at all; needs renaming. In general, cameos belong on the pages they're about. Maybe it could even be put at [[Pikmin in other games]]? | |||
:Wait, 'Pikameos'...?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} 20:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:12, April 19, 2008
I feel that this page needs to be renamed, but what to?- Greenpickle(talk) 19:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean with "what to"? Prezintenden(babble) 08:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I meant 'to what?'. The name seems wrong/misleading.- Greenpickle(talk) 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree, cameo doesn't really sound correct, but I can't come up anything else. I would have said "references" or "brand appearences", but those are even worse.
Also, I find that this page only gives information that is completely obvious and is already given on the corresponding treasure articles, but since it has already been made it doesn't seem right to put in the deletion category. Prezintenden(babble) 17:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Other reference
Should the origins of Olimar and Louie's names be here?
- Not sure; seems mostly to only refer to brands so far, which aren't really cameos at all; needs renaming. In general, cameos belong on the pages they're about. Maybe it could even be put at Pikmin in other games?