Talk:Breakable pot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(name change?) |
(Support) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# the name jar is pretty short and non-descriptive. Wouldn't it be best with conjectural names to make things unambiguous? | # the name jar is pretty short and non-descriptive. Wouldn't it be best with conjectural names to make things unambiguous? | ||
for these reasons I propose moving to the name [[Breakable pot]] in particular, but it can be discussed if a better name would work. --[[User:PopitTart|PopitTart]] ([[User talk:PopitTart|talk]]) 15:29, November 21, 2023 (EST) | for these reasons I propose moving to the name [[Breakable pot]] in particular, but it can be discussed if a better name would work. --[[User:PopitTart|PopitTart]] ([[User talk:PopitTart|talk]]) 15:29, November 21, 2023 (EST) | ||
:"Breakable pot" is also the name I've suggested in the past, and I think it's a much better name. — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 15:35, November 21, 2023 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 16:35, November 21, 2023
Move to better name
I think that "jar" is really an unsatisfactory name for this obstacle, for a couple reasons.
- Not all of them are jars. Specifically, the ceramics you encounter in the prologue and OST are clearly flowerpots.
- the name jar is pretty short and non-descriptive. Wouldn't it be best with conjectural names to make things unambiguous?
for these reasons I propose moving to the name Breakable pot in particular, but it can be discussed if a better name would work. --PopitTart (talk) 15:29, November 21, 2023 (EST)