Template talk:Enemies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Prezintenden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::::You just convinced me. Open to other ideas if this is wrong. But considering <nowiki>{{treasures}}</nowiki>, it just seems right.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} | :::::You just convinced me. Open to other ideas if this is wrong. But considering <nowiki>{{treasures}}</nowiki>, it just seems right.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} | ||
...That's why I asked. You've got it wrong: this does have every enemy on it ''from Pikmin 1''. That's the template. But now I sort of think that all enemies should be in the same template, with ''Pikmin 1'', ''Pikmin 2'' and ''Both Games'' headings. That would be called "Piklopedia", of course, as outlined at [[Forum:Page Footers]]. So should we merge them like that or keep them separate as planned at that page.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} |
Revision as of 17:10, January 10, 2008
Is "Pikmin Enemies" the right name/title for this? If so, it's ready to be put on pages.GP
- It's fine. What template do we insert?--Prezintenden
- Template is {{Pikmin Enemies}}. If you don't mind me saying, though, the name seems a bit...drab? Probably the wrong word to use, but... I mean, it'll be fine if nothing better can be found, but perhaps it could use a bit of discussion before being slapped onto pages.
- You're right, but it is what they are. "Foes"; I don't know. "Hostiles" and such is too fancy, and that also adds a little childish touch in a way. "Enemies" is the word used most throughout the wiki. Although, staying with the standard or simple isn't always bad (I find).--Prezintenden
- Okay, maybe "drab" really was a bad word to use. I'm actually having a little trouble putting the thought into words.... I just think we might be able to rephrase it, like Enemies of Pikmin, or even just Enemies. The treasure template is just Treasures. Saying Pikmin Enemies or Enemies of Pikmin actually seems kind of redundant, considering that this is exclusively a Pikmin wiki, you know?
- You just convinced me. Open to other ideas if this is wrong. But considering {{treasures}}, it just seems right.--Prezintenden
...That's why I asked. You've got it wrong: this does have every enemy on it from Pikmin 1. That's the template. But now I sort of think that all enemies should be in the same template, with Pikmin 1, Pikmin 2 and Both Games headings. That would be called "Piklopedia", of course, as outlined at Forum:Page Footers. So should we merge them like that or keep them separate as planned at that page.GP