Category talk:Navigation templates: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Many (all?) of these were recently made collapsible. I'm not convinced this is a good idea - my reasoning is here. I may at some point have a go ...") |
m (Reverted edits by Trig Jegman (talk) to last revision by Greenpickle) Tag: Rollback |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Many (all?) of these were recently made collapsible. I'm not convinced this is a good idea - my reasoning is [[User talk:173.70.30.125|here]]. I may at some point have a go at making the collapsible stuff look less terrible, but it's still to be discussed whether they even need to be collapsible (if not, the link is just making things look untidy) - and if any should be collapsed by default. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 05:03, 29 July 2012 (EDT) | Many (all?) of these were recently made collapsible. I'm not convinced this is a good idea - my reasoning is [[User talk:173.70.30.125|here]]. I may at some point have a go at making the collapsible stuff look less terrible, but it's still to be discussed whether they even need to be collapsible (if not, the link is just making things look untidy) - and if any should be collapsed by default. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 05:03, 29 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
:I see no reason to collapse something that appears at the very bottom of articles, especially when it's navigation. Is clicking a button to view the categories any easier than scrolling a tiny bit further (if at all)? Scrolling is bad, but clicking is worse. {{User:Locke/Sig}} 09:23, 30 July 2012 (EDT) | |||
::I think the idea is there ''may'' be something below them - some pages have multiple such templates, and the categories are there. Think enemies with {{tem|enemies}}, which is quite long, followed by {{tem|harmless enemies}}. So maybe there is a need in some cases - but yeah, certainly not all. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 14:52, 30 July 2012 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:31, January 4, 2023
Many (all?) of these were recently made collapsible. I'm not convinced this is a good idea - my reasoning is here. I may at some point have a go at making the collapsible stuff look less terrible, but it's still to be discussed whether they even need to be collapsible (if not, the link is just making things look untidy) - and if any should be collapsed by default. GP 05:03, 29 July 2012 (EDT)
- I see no reason to collapse something that appears at the very bottom of articles, especially when it's navigation. Is clicking a button to view the categories any easier than scrolling a tiny bit further (if at all)? Scrolling is bad, but clicking is worse. << Locke(talk|contribs) >> 09:23, 30 July 2012 (EDT)
- I think the idea is there may be something below them - some pages have multiple such templates, and the categories are there. Think enemies with {{enemies}}, which is quite long, followed by {{harmless enemies}}. So maybe there is a need in some cases - but yeah, certainly not all. GP 14:52, 30 July 2012 (EDT)