Forum:Real life treasure pics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(replaced jpg) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Watercooler | {{Forumheader|Watercooler}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Recently my friend bought the NPC Pikmin 2, ever since then, hes been hooked. So I told him about Pikipedia, though he doesnt have an account or has edited yet, he uses the Pikipedia to help him with the treasures, however... He told me that the ''Treasure articles should have a picture of what they look like in real life.'' This got me thinking, considering how this is a international wiki, it may be possible to do this. Though some may be hard to get (Shock therapist) we could get the closest thing to it. I could get quite a few pics, such as the [[Courage Reactor]], [[Quenching Emblem]] (Perfect condition), [[Luck Wafer]] ('''Nintendo'''), and the [[Priceless Statue|Priceless]] and [[Worthless Statue|Worthless]] statues. We could put the image similarly to the [[Remembered Old Buddy|R.O.B]] article. We basically get a picture of what certain treasures look like in real life. So, what do you think? | Recently my friend bought the NPC Pikmin 2, ever since then, hes been hooked. So I told him about Pikipedia, though he doesnt have an account or has edited yet, he uses the Pikipedia to help him with the treasures, however... He told me that the ''Treasure articles should have a picture of what they look like in real life.'' This got me thinking, considering how this is a international wiki, it may be possible to do this. Though some may be hard to get (Shock therapist) we could get the closest thing to it. I could get quite a few pics, such as the [[Courage Reactor]], [[Quenching Emblem]] (Perfect condition), [[Luck Wafer]] ('''Nintendo'''), and the [[Priceless Statue|Priceless]] and [[Worthless Statue|Worthless]] statues. We could put the image similarly to the [[Remembered Old Buddy|R.O.B]] article. We basically get a picture of what certain treasures look like in real life. So, what do you think? {{User:Joshazilla23/Sig}} | ||
''' | '''Comments''' | ||
* | *No offence, but this is a pretty stupid idea. 201 images of random junk on articles with the caption, 'this is what it looks like in real life!' | ||
and its not really needed, if we can get the images then people will either know what it is already and if not will get a clear understanding from the pikmin image. | |||
--[[User:Semajdraehs|<span style="color:Blue">Semaj</span><span style="color:Red">draehs</span>]]- <span style="color:green"> any replies to my</span> [[User talk:Semajdraehs|<span style="color:Grey">Talk page</span>]] 18:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
' | Btw, my friend made this proposal, not me, he kinda forced me, if you get what i'm saying. Also I do have to agree with you, some are fairly obvious. However some like the [[Spiny Alien Treat]] can be hard to tell what it is. Maybe a link should be put to their respective Wikipedia articles so they can get some more info on the object. {{User:Joshazilla23/Sig}} | ||
I agree that each page should actually say what the treasure appears to be and maybe a section on external links that has a wikipedia link to the appropriate article (although it doesn't take that much effort to look that up yourself) | |||
--[[User:Semajdraehs|<span style="color:Blue">Semaj</span><span style="color:Red">draehs</span>]]- <span style="color:green"> any replies to my</span> [[User talk:Semajdraehs|<span style="color:Grey">Talk page</span>]] 19:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
''' | Yeah, I agree that Wikipedia links are enough. Most treasures are quite accurate, so the images would be similar, which would be silly.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
Well you can get those lazy ones... [[File:Blue Pikmin runs P1 art.png|50px]][[User:Joshazilla23|<span style='color:blue'>Josha</span>]][[User talk:Joshazilla23|<span style='color:green'>zilla</span>]]<span style='color:blue'>23</span> [[File:Olimar pulls Blue Pikmin P1 art.png|45px]] 21:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:44, November 4, 2018
Recently my friend bought the NPC Pikmin 2, ever since then, hes been hooked. So I told him about Pikipedia, though he doesnt have an account or has edited yet, he uses the Pikipedia to help him with the treasures, however... He told me that the Treasure articles should have a picture of what they look like in real life. This got me thinking, considering how this is a international wiki, it may be possible to do this. Though some may be hard to get (Shock therapist) we could get the closest thing to it. I could get quite a few pics, such as the Courage Reactor, Quenching Emblem (Perfect condition), Luck Wafer (Nintendo), and the Priceless and Worthless statues. We could put the image similarly to the R.O.B article. We basically get a picture of what certain treasures look like in real life. So, what do you think? RWAR! ~JOSHAZILLA!!!~ AND IMAFIRINMAHLAZOR!!!
Comments
- No offence, but this is a pretty stupid idea. 201 images of random junk on articles with the caption, 'this is what it looks like in real life!'
and its not really needed, if we can get the images then people will either know what it is already and if not will get a clear understanding from the pikmin image.
--Semajdraehs- any replies to my Talk page 18:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Btw, my friend made this proposal, not me, he kinda forced me, if you get what i'm saying. Also I do have to agree with you, some are fairly obvious. However some like the Spiny Alien Treat can be hard to tell what it is. Maybe a link should be put to their respective Wikipedia articles so they can get some more info on the object. RWAR! ~JOSHAZILLA!!!~ AND IMAFIRINMAHLAZOR!!!
I agree that each page should actually say what the treasure appears to be and maybe a section on external links that has a wikipedia link to the appropriate article (although it doesn't take that much effort to look that up yourself)
--Semajdraehs- any replies to my Talk page 19:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree that Wikipedia links are enough. Most treasures are quite accurate, so the images would be similar, which would be silly.GP
Well you can get those lazy ones... Joshazilla23 21:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)