Pikipedia talk:Collectible article guidelines: Difference between revisions
m (Espyo moved page Pikipedia talk:Collectible article policy to Pikipedia talk:Collectible article guidelines without leaving a redirect) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I feel like this should be changed to "Collectible article policy" or something like that, because fruits aren't the only major collectibles: we've got ship parts in Pikmin and treasures in Pikmin 2. Ship part, treasure, and fruit articles can all follow the same general layout. {{User:PikFan23/sig}} 04:07, 6 March 2016 (EST) | I feel like this should be changed to "Collectible article policy" or something like that, because fruits aren't the only major collectibles: we've got ship parts in Pikmin and treasures in Pikmin 2. Ship part, treasure, and fruit articles can all follow the same general layout. {{User:PikFan23/sig}} 04:07, 6 March 2016 (EST) | ||
:I'm starting to think that this was initially written as a collectible article policy, and then my mind slipped and made it fruit-only. I'll update it. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:58, 8 March 2016 (EST) | :I'm starting to think that this was initially written as a collectible article policy, and then my mind slipped and made it fruit-only. I'll update it. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:58, 8 March 2016 (EST) | ||
== Real world images == | |||
[[User:Results May Vary|Results May Vary]]'s recent changes pointed out how some real world images of treasures are pointless, since users can just check Wikipedia for them. I agree, but only partially. Maybe we should make it a guideline that if a subject has images that are hard to find, or only very specific real world variations exist, then we should have an image on the Pikipedia article, ''if it is under a good license''. Otherwise, if it's something anybody knows of, and can instantly find in the equivalent Wikipedia article, like a watermelon, it shouldn't be included in the article. I think we should have some way of linking to an external image in this case though, for convenience's sake. Thoughts? — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 11:15, 5 October 2018 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:15, October 5, 2018
I feel like this should be changed to "Collectible article policy" or something like that, because fruits aren't the only major collectibles: we've got ship parts in Pikmin and treasures in Pikmin 2. Ship part, treasure, and fruit articles can all follow the same general layout. ~PikFan23 04:07, 6 March 2016 (EST)
- I'm starting to think that this was initially written as a collectible article policy, and then my mind slipped and made it fruit-only. I'll update it. — {EspyoT} 07:58, 8 March 2016 (EST)
Real world images
Results May Vary's recent changes pointed out how some real world images of treasures are pointless, since users can just check Wikipedia for them. I agree, but only partially. Maybe we should make it a guideline that if a subject has images that are hard to find, or only very specific real world variations exist, then we should have an image on the Pikipedia article, if it is under a good license. Otherwise, if it's something anybody knows of, and can instantly find in the equivalent Wikipedia article, like a watermelon, it shouldn't be included in the article. I think we should have some way of linking to an external image in this case though, for convenience's sake. Thoughts? — {EspyoT} 11:15, 5 October 2018 (EDT)