Talk:Libra glitch: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Undo: Too much conversation. Keeping for archival purposes.) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Why would someone search for that? This is the place they would most likely hear about it first. Also, we ''could'' categorize the redirect as such. We wouldn't have a useless article, but it would still be easy for someone looking for glitches to find. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 18:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | ::Why would someone search for that? This is the place they would most likely hear about it first. Also, we ''could'' categorize the redirect as such. We wouldn't have a useless article, but it would still be easy for someone looking for glitches to find. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 18:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::The same reason we have [[prezidant]]... well it was some odd redirect... that I don't know how to spell. Ah, Prez knows...{{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | :::The same reason we have <nowiki>[[prezidant]]</nowiki>... well it was some odd redirect... that I don't know how to spell. Ah, Prez knows...{{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | ||
::::...Are you suggesting someone could misspell "Libra" as "Libra Glitch"? {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 20:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::No, no... I'm saying someone has or is bound to search for it... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | |||
::::::Yeah, there's no problem with having a redirect, right? And what you're saying about categorising it - would that work for a redirect? Would it make sense? Should 'Libra glitch' not be the one categorised in that way instead?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | |||
:::::::Yes categorize Libra Glitc than redirect to Libra... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | |||
:::::::Yeah, you can categorize redirects - I'm pretty sure the Zelda Wiki does that, actually. The reason why we might want to do that is so it can still be categorized as a glitch without requiring its own article and without categorizing the Libra treasure as a glitch. Also, yeah, like Crystal said, once somebody clicked the link in the category, they would be redirected to the appropriate section of the Libra article. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 07:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Ha! I had a good idea. Win! {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}} | |||
Latest revision as of 09:08, October 5, 2018
I believe this was separated from the article before and we chose to put it in the main article. I think that, since this page is so short, it should be made a redirect to that part of the article.GP
Unless this redirect is going to be categorized under Glitches, it should probably be deleted, and links redirected to the Libra article. —Jimbo Jambo 21:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is more for if people are searching 'Libra glitch', in which case they're sent to the right page via this one.GP
- Yeah, you can categorize redirects - I'm pretty sure the Zelda Wiki does that, actually. The reason why we might want to do that is so it can still be categorized as a glitch without requiring its own article and without categorizing the Libra treasure as a glitch. Also, yeah, like Crystal said, once somebody clicked the link in the category, they would be redirected to the appropriate section of the Libra article. —Jimbo Jambo 07:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)