44,468
edits
Template talk:News: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Phineas81707 (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::::Oh.... Ok [[User:Pikifan4|Pikifan4]] ([[User talk:Pikifan4|talk]]) 12:20, 29 January 2016 (EST) | ::::Oh.... Ok [[User:Pikifan4|Pikifan4]] ([[User talk:Pikifan4|talk]]) 12:20, 29 January 2016 (EST) | ||
:::::I remember this... I saw the 900 articles news thing, and almost singlehandedly merged and/or deleted every article that needed to be merged/deleted- those five articles dipped us down. I'm personally in favour of, once we reach 900 again, adding a news point that says "We've reached 900 articles '''for real''' this time." or something to that effect. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 18:11, 29 January 2016 (EST) | :::::I remember this... I saw the 900 articles news thing, and almost singlehandedly merged and/or deleted every article that needed to be merged/deleted- those five articles dipped us down. I'm personally in favour of, once we reach 900 again, adding a news point that says "We've reached 900 articles '''for real''' this time." or something to that effect. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 18:11, 29 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::::::Sure, but the problem could just repeat itself. We could be at 900, then find an article that could be merged into a different article, or a disambiguation that could be made into a redirect, and it dips us down back to 899. Honestly, I don't think it's worth putting much thought into this. The 1000 article announcement will be more important, and hopefully, more organized. | |||