Talk:Mission Mode: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Phineas81707 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
(I figured this was the best place to put this suggestion) Would it be a good idea to put the number of "Battle Enemies!" Points on the relevant enemy articles? If so, where exactly do we put them? [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 05:37, 2 December 2015 (EST) | (I figured this was the best place to put this suggestion) Would it be a good idea to put the number of "Battle Enemies!" Points on the relevant enemy articles? If so, where exactly do we put them? [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 05:37, 2 December 2015 (EST) | ||
:Already there. Check the Stats section of any enemy article. It has both the Pokos and BE! points (they're the same). Unless you mean something else? — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 05:43, 2 December 2015 (EST) | :Already there. Check the Stats section of any enemy article. It has both the Pokos and BE! points (they're the same). Unless you mean something else? — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 05:43, 2 December 2015 (EST) | ||
::Checked [[Swooping Snitchbug]], and yep, it's there. Weird: I don't recall ever seeing it whenever I checked that table. I'll need to check more thoroughly in a bit. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 06:30, 2 December 2015 (EST) |
Revision as of 07:30, December 2, 2015
(I figured this was the best place to put this suggestion) Would it be a good idea to put the number of "Battle Enemies!" Points on the relevant enemy articles? If so, where exactly do we put them? Phineas81707 (talk) 05:37, 2 December 2015 (EST)
- Already there. Check the Stats section of any enemy article. It has both the Pokos and BE! points (they're the same). Unless you mean something else? — {EspyoT} 05:43, 2 December 2015 (EST)
- Checked Swooping Snitchbug, and yep, it's there. Weird: I don't recall ever seeing it whenever I checked that table. I'll need to check more thoroughly in a bit. Phineas81707 (talk) 06:30, 2 December 2015 (EST)