Editing Talk:Spotcap

Jump to navigation Jump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 9: Line 9:


Admittedly, as just a standard user, I don't want to rashly try splitting the pages myself, especially if it turns out this idea literally came from just the one edit that added the template, and then myself. So I'll pose the question here--should we split the Spotcap and Kingcap? -[[User:Camwoodstock|Camwoodstock]] ([[User talk:Camwoodstock|talk]]) 13:10, February 2, 2022 (EST)
Admittedly, as just a standard user, I don't want to rashly try splitting the pages myself, especially if it turns out this idea literally came from just the one edit that added the template, and then myself. So I'll pose the question here--should we split the Spotcap and Kingcap? -[[User:Camwoodstock|Camwoodstock]] ([[User talk:Camwoodstock|talk]]) 13:10, February 2, 2022 (EST)
:Honestly I think the articles might work split. But I think the small brown mushroom should probably be lumped in with the Spotcap. It's not that they are the same thing, but it's that it's a good article for the info to be in, similar to how [[juice]] information is in the [[fruit]] article. It could go under the minor obstacles article, but it's almost exactly the same thing as the Spotcap, just with a different coat of paint. Don't think it makes sense to create a section in the minor obstacles article that'll just copy-paste a chunk of the Spotcap article. &mdash; '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 14:16, February 7, 2022 (EST)
::That much makes sense--split the Spotcap and Kingcap, but keep the strange brown mushrooms to the Spotcap's article. And obviously should the brown mushrooms be different enough somehow--like them having a wholly unique species name that Nintendo suddenly reveals--''then'' it can be split to its own article. Obviously, I don't exactly have the power to split the articles, but I feel like people are more-or-less fine with splitting it, right? :O [[User:Camwoodstock|Camwoodstock]] ([[User talk:Camwoodstock|talk]]) 11:26, February 10, 2022 (EST)
== The brown variety is apparently called "Dusty Mushrooms" ==
So thanks to [https://twitter.com/_Flamsey/status/1594761136448094210 this] I saw that [[Quaggled Mireclops#Olimar's comments|Olimar's commetns about the Quaggled Mireclops]] apparently say that the brown variety of these mushrooms are called "Dusty Mushrooms". It is true that there Olimar mention some "Dusty Mushrooms" and a plant called "Sleeping Beauty" too, though it doesn't specify which plants are those. He mentions them while saying that those plants could grow thanks to the inside of the Quaggled Mireclops, but I don't see any mushrooms growing on top of or close to the Quaggled Mireclops, so I don't know.
Still, it could be that Olimar is referring to plants that ''can'' grow thanks to the Quaggled Mireclops, not necessarily plants that were currently growing on it, and the name "Dusty Mushrooms" could also be referring to that brown variety of the Spotcap. They are dusty, they are mushrooms, and I don't think that there are other known mushrooms in the game where that name could be attributed to. So do you think that that Olimar's comment is enough to call them "Dusty Mushrooms"? That would also leave what the heck are "Sleeping Beauty", but that is other topic. -[[User:Kirbeat|Kirbeat]] ([[User talk:Kirbeat|talk]]) 18:32, November 21, 2022 (EST)
:"Dusty Mushroom" is actually the name for these objects internally as well, specified in the file with the lock-on names for plants. So it's definitely the most official name for these mushrooms. I think it should be mentioned in the article. The name "Sleeping Beauty" is also in the files, for a plant that according to the Pikmin Technical Knowledge Base is a "flat clover patch". &mdash; [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 20:51, November 21, 2022 (EST)
::Well nice. Now, if they do have an official name different from the Spotcaps, shouldn't they have their own page instead? I see that one of the arguments to split the Kingcaps was that they have different names (other one was that they have more health, and I don't know if the Dusty Mushrooms and the Spotcaps have different health). Still, they have different names and appearance, which makes them a different species, and even if they appear in just one area, they were acknowledged by Olimar which is something I think. Also, this leaves me wondering: what was displayed when the Dusty Mushrooms were locked-on in the Wii U Pikmin 3? -[[User:Kirbeat|Kirbeat]] ([[User talk:Kirbeat|talk]]) 22:18, November 21, 2022 (EST)
:::You can't lock onto them in the original ''Pikmin 3''. As for whether they should get an article, it's hard to say. They're not especially important, which would normally mean they shouldn't get an article. But they're not Spotcaps, and they're also more important than anything in the [[Vegetation]] article, since you can interact with them and they appear on the radar. So I'm not sure. &mdash; [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 23:15, November 21, 2022 (EST)
::::I am leaning more towards them having their own article, but for now I will just cover them in the Spotcap article, until more  people give their opinion or something. And one thing; in [[pikmintkb:Pikmin 3 identifiers|this]] I see that apparently the Dusty Mushrooms are referred to as "Hokoritake" and the "Sleeping Beauty" as "katabami" in the files. How do you know for sure that those names are referring to those two plants? Or why did you say that the names "Dusty Mushroom" and "Sleeping Beauty" appear in the files through "Hokoritake" and "katabami"? Unless each translates directly to the other which I cannot confirm, the names are just different. -[[User:Kirbeat|Kirbeat]] ([[User talk:Kirbeat|talk]]) 05:38, November 22, 2022 (EST)
:::::I went to check the Japanese version of the notes, but they don't mention the mushrooms. They mention {{j|カタバミ|katabami|{{w|Oxalis_corniculata|sleeping beauty}}|f=tp}} and {{j|ウリカワ|urikawa|{{w|Sagittaria pygmaea|dwarf arrowhead}}|f=tp}}. Both plants are shown on [[media:Scan_48.jpeg|this scan]], and both grow on top of the creature. [[User:2 B|2 B]] ([[User talk:2 B|talk]]) 08:32, November 22, 2022 (EST)
:::::I got the names from the files. "Dusty Mushroom" is the name for <code>hokoritake</code> in the file that specifies the lock-on name of objects (even though this particular object cannot be locked-on to), and "Sleeping Beauty" is the name for <code>katabami</code> in a seemingly-unused file with the names of several plants. Perhaps the writers had access to these files but didn't consider whether the names are actually visible in-game? Regardless, they are definitely official names for these objects. &mdash; [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 16:06, November 22, 2022 (EST)
::::::Ah alright, I see now, thanks! Also that difference in the Japanese version of Olimar's comment is interesting. -[[User:Kirbeat|Kirbeat]] ([[User talk:Kirbeat|talk]]) 07:02, November 23, 2022 (EST)
== Pikmin 4 ==
They act like spotcaps, they appear near kingcaps like spotcaps, and the main difference between the Pikmin 3 and Pikmin 4 designs is shared with the kingcaps, so why is it that kingcaps are counted as appearing as Pikmin 4, but spotcaps aren't? [[User:2 B|2 B]] ([[User talk:2 B|talk]]) 15:13, October 5, 2023 (EDT)

Please note that all contributions to Pikipedia are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (see Pikipedia:Copyrights for details). Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: