Editing Talk:Pikmin limit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What enemies are capable of burying Pikmin in the [[Twilight River]] or [[Garden of Hope]]? I know I can check ''Pikmin'' (at least the New Play Control! verson) by being sufficiently insane and burying Pikmin with the [[Swooping Snitchbug]], but for the life of me I can't find an enemy in ''Pikmin 3''. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 06:03, 15 November 2015 (EST) | What enemies are capable of burying Pikmin in the [[Twilight River]] or [[Garden of Hope]]? I know I can check ''Pikmin'' (at least the New Play Control! verson) by being sufficiently insane and burying Pikmin with the [[Swooping Snitchbug]], but for the life of me I can't find an enemy in ''Pikmin 3''. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 06:03, 15 November 2015 (EST) | ||
:...Probably none, really. Plus, it doesn't matter much because even if you bury 100 Pikmin, you need to use at least one non-buried Pikmin to destroy the Arachnode, and three non-buried Winged Pikmin to pluck the blue Onion. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 10:52, 15 November 2015 (EST) | :...Probably none, really. Plus, it doesn't matter much because even if you bury 100 Pikmin, you need to use at least one non-buried Pikmin to destroy the Arachnode, and three non-buried Winged Pikmin to pluck the blue Onion. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 10:52, 15 November 2015 (EST) | ||
Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
::::I had hopes. Now we can see why I'm not one of the technical editors. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 08:43, 17 November 2015 (EST) | ::::I had hopes. Now we can see why I'm not one of the technical editors. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 08:43, 17 November 2015 (EST) | ||
Ok so, to recap: | Ok so, to recap: | ||
*In ''Pikmin'' | *In ''Pikmin'' | ||
Line 42: | Line 39: | ||
::Yup. Scientific method strikes again: not guaranteed. Which means that further tests are near-meaningless for the first one. Which may also mean Pikmin 3 may need a re-check... although the fact that Pikmin 3 is easier to test and probably has a better error routine means that I trust that stable number a bit more. Will probably do a bunch of retests later. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 04:34, 18 November 2015 (EST) | ::Yup. Scientific method strikes again: not guaranteed. Which means that further tests are near-meaningless for the first one. Which may also mean Pikmin 3 may need a re-check... although the fact that Pikmin 3 is easier to test and probably has a better error routine means that I trust that stable number a bit more. Will probably do a bunch of retests later. [[User:Phineas81707|Phineas81707]] ([[User talk:Phineas81707|talk]]) 04:34, 18 November 2015 (EST) | ||