Editing Talk:Libra glitch

I believe this was separated from the article before and we chose to put it in the main article.  I think that, since this page is so short, it should be made a redirect to that part of the article.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}

:I agree {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}}

Unless this redirect is going to be categorized under Glitches, it should probably be deleted, and links redirected to the Libra article. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 21:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

:I think this is more for if people are searching 'Libra glitch', in which case they're sent to the right page via this one.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}

::Why would someone search for that? This is the place they would most likely hear about it first. Also, we ''could'' categorize the redirect as such. We wouldn't have a useless article, but it would still be easy for someone looking for glitches to find. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 18:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

:::The same reason we have [[prezidant]]... well it was some odd redirect... that I don't know how to spell. Ah, Prez knows...{{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}}

::::...Are you suggesting someone could misspell "Libra" as "Libra Glitch"? {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 20:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

:::::No, no... I'm saying someone has or is bound to search for it... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}}

::::::Yeah, there's no problem with having a redirect, right?  And what you're saying about categorising it - would that work for a redirect?  Would it make sense?  Should 'Libra glitch' not be the one categorised in that way instead?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}

::::::::Yes categorize Libra Glitc than redirect to Libra... {{User:Crystal_lucario/Sig}}