Editing Talk:Glitches in Pikmin 3
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For the Early scornet maestro, early quaggled mireclops and formidable oak backwards, I can't access the youtube videos. It says video doesn't exist ~Ford4385 | For the Early scornet maestro, early quaggled mireclops and formidable oak backwards, I can't access the youtube videos. It says video doesn't exist ~Ford4385 | ||
:Fixed now. The person who added the video URLs didn't set them up to work with the glitch template, so it was linking to the videos wrong. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 18:32, 18 February 2015 (EST) | :Fixed now. The person who added the video URLs didn't set them up to work with the glitch template, so it was linking to the videos wrong. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 18:32, 18 February 2015 (EST) | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
::I'm going to try to do it a second time, but we still will need independent verification. {{User:Peach Bulborb/sig}} | ::I'm going to try to do it a second time, but we still will need independent verification. {{User:Peach Bulborb/sig}} | ||
:::If you can pull it off again, and understand the steps needed to recreate it, then there's no need for another person to verify. It only makes sense for another person to reproduce it if it's some outlandish glitch, specially from a user nobody ever heard of. As long as you can gather easy steps to reproduce, it's fine. People who think the glitch is fake can try it for themselves. If we had more glitches being submitted constantly, we should start worrying about a procedure to weed out the bad ones, but we don't, so... — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 11:07, 4 July 2015 (EDT) | :::If you can pull it off again, and understand the steps needed to recreate it, then there's no need for another person to verify. It only makes sense for another person to reproduce it if it's some outlandish glitch, specially from a user nobody ever heard of. As long as you can gather easy steps to reproduce, it's fine. People who think the glitch is fake can try it for themselves. If we had more glitches being submitted constantly, we should start worrying about a procedure to weed out the bad ones, but we don't, so... — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 11:07, 4 July 2015 (EDT) | ||